Contact

We welcome your feedback, story tips, technical clarifications, and partnership inquiries. Please use the form below or reach us directly via email.

Email

For all inquiries, contact us at:

tkdfkr93 [at] gmail [dot] com

(Replace [at] with @ and [dot] with . — formatted this way to reduce spam.)

We typically respond within 2 business days.

What to include in your message

  • Corrections: Article URL, the specific technical or financial claim you believe is incorrect, and a link to a more accurate source if available (Samsung Newsroom, IEDM paper, SEC filing, etc.).
  • Story tips: Topic (memory pricing, foundry capacity, HBM customer win, process node yield, etc.), what you've heard, and any source materials. Anonymity respected for industry insiders.
  • Technical clarifications: We welcome corrections from semiconductor engineers — please cite the relevant technical source (IEDM/VLSI/ISSCC paper, IEEE Spectrum article, Samsung Foundry Forum slide deck).
  • Press / partnership inquiries: Company, your role, and a brief description of the proposal. We do not accept paid placements or sponsored editorial.
  • Privacy / data requests (GDPR/CCPA): Specify the right you'd like to exercise (access, deletion, etc.).

Contact form

You can also use the embedded contact form below:

Note: For privacy reasons, please do not include sensitive personal information (full account numbers, brokerage statements, etc.) in messages to us.

Response time

  • Corrections / factual errors: 24-48 hours
  • Technical clarifications from industry sources: 24-48 hours (priority)
  • Story tips: 2-5 business days
  • Partnership / press inquiries: 5-7 business days
  • Privacy requests: Within 30 days as required by GDPR/CCPA

We do not accept guest posts, sponsored content disguised as editorial, paid placement of links in existing articles, or any form of stock promotion. All editorial content is independent.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samsung Electronics 2026: Analyst Forecast and Record Q1 Earnings

Image
Samsung Electronics 2026: Analyst Forecast and Record Q1 Earnings Did one quarter just invalidate every Samsung Electronics bear thesis in circulation? When a single Q1 operating profit exceeds the company's entire prior-year total, the consensus models need rewriting. After 22 years tracking Samsung's semiconductor cycles from the original Exynos 4 era through every memory downturn — here is what the analyst data actually tells you in May 2026. All figures converted at approximately ₩1,480 per USD (May 2026 reference rate). Quick Take: Samsung Electronics (005930) Stock in May 2026 One quarter, one year's worth of profit: Q1 2026 operating profit of $38.6B exceeded Samsung's entire FY2025 operating profit of $29.5B — in a single quarter. This is not a rounding error. Semiconductor is now 93% of the earnings story: The DS (Device Solutions) Division contributed $36.3B of $38.6B total Q1 operating profit. Mobile, displays, and consumer electronics are earnin...
Read more

2026 Samsung HBM4 vs SK Hynix HBM4 Complete Guide: 9 Critical Differences for Investors

Image
Wondering whether Samsung HBM4 finally closes the gap with SK Hynix in the AI memory war that's defined the past three years? Curious which supplier Nvidia will lock in for Blackwell Ultra and Rubin platforms? After 22 years covering Samsung's memory business — and building competitive HBM models for institutional clients since the original HBM2 ramp in 2018 — here's my honest, no-fluff breakdown of the 9 differences that actually matter between Samsung and SK Hynix's HBM4 entries in 2026. Key Takeaways: 5 Things to Know About Samsung HBM4 vs SK Hynix HBM4 Bandwidth : Samsung claims ~2.0 TB/s per stack, SK Hynix shipping ~2.0 TB/s; performance roughly parity at announcement Capacity : both targeting 36 GB and 48 GB stacks (12-Hi and 16-Hi configurations) Process node : Samsung using 1c DRAM (~10nm class), SK Hynix on 1b — Samsung's smaller process is a meaningful structural advantage if yield holds Customer status : SK Hynix has Nvidia primary, Sam...
Read more

2026 Samsung Foundry 2nm GAAFET Roadmap: 9 Critical Questions

Image
Can Samsung close a 15-point yield gap with TSMC before the 2026 AI-chip procurement cycle locks in final designs? Does a 33% lower wafer price justify the risk when your tape-out NRE budget exceeds $40 million? And what does it actually signal that Tesla's AI6 chip landed at a Samsung fab while Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon quietly migrated to TSMC N2P? After 22 years covering Samsung's foundry business — from the original 14nm FinFET ramp in 2014 to today's 2nm GAAFET battle — here is my honest take. The SF2 node is technically credible, commercially risky, and geopolitically indispensable. What follows is my full breakdown, built from IEDM and VLSI Symposium disclosures, TrendForce supply-chain surveys, SEC-equivalent DART filings, and two decades of Samsung foundry supply chain modeling. Key Takeaways: 5 Things to Know About Samsung Foundry 2nm Transistor density up 27%. Samsung SF2 delivers ~231 MTr/mm², up from ~182 MTr/mm² on SF3 (3nm GAAFET) — squarely...
Read more